About This Site

Figaro rips the innards out of things people say and reveals the rhetorical tricks and pratfalls. For terms and definitions, click here.
(What are figures of speech?)
Ask Figaro a question!

This form does not yet contain any fields.

    « Alito: Arch or Flaming? | Main | “I’m Going to Prison” Is a Good Start »
    Monday
    Jan092006

    Women and Honest Politicians Last

    tomtanic.jpgQuote:  "You know how people talk about the captain being willing to go down with the ship? Well, in this case, it would have been the ship going down with the captain."  Anonymous member of Congress in the L.A. Times.

    Figure of Speechchiasmus (key AS muss), the criss-cross figure.

    Tom DeLay's career has hit an iceberg — the guilty plea of Jack Abramoff, crooked lobbyist and crony of the Hammer.  The anonymous Republican uses our very favorite figure, the chiasmus, to sum up the situation:  the impending DeLay scandal could have sunk the whole GOP leadership.

    The chiasmus (the Greek letter "X") takes a phrase and plays it backwards.  JFK used it in a speech — "Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country" — and thousands joined the Peace Corps.  Who says figures aren't powerful?

    Snappy Answer:  "Could you keel-haul him first?"

    PrintView Printer Friendly Version

    EmailEmail Article to Friend

    References (2)

    References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.
    • Response
      Response: this is very good
      related source
    • Response
      Response: this is very good
      good related article

    Reader Comments (2)

    And Clinton asked Monica, "Ask what you can do for your President..."
    January 9, 2006 | Unregistered Commentergb
    Fellow figurist John Francis sends this one:
    "In the middle of last year a London graffiti artist went out to paint on the wall running through the West Bank. They showed a piece of the TV news. He said, 'Graffiti should comfort the disturbed and disturb the comfortable.' Might be original."

    Actually, it isn't. For years, journalists' motto was to "afflict the comfortable, and comfort the afflicted." Funny they don't say that anymore.

    Fig.
    March 8, 2006 | Registered CommenterFigaro

    PostPost a New Comment

    Enter your information below to add a new comment.

    My response is on my own website »
    Author Email (optional):
    Author URL (optional):
    Post:
     
    All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.