About This Site

Figaro rips the innards out of things people say and reveals the rhetorical tricks and pratfalls. For terms and definitions, click here.
(What are figures of speech?)
Ask Figaro a question!

This form does not yet contain any fields.

    « How Well Do You Know the Constitution? | Main | Civility and Suicide »
    Monday
    Oct182010

    George Philip’s Awesome Impactfulness

    After suffering a 30-percent reduction in state funding, SUNY Albany plans the elimination—sorry, “suspension of new admission”—of some humanities departments. Its president, a graduate of the institution, published an op ed piece whose abominable style undoes his argument.

    While most of the actions will affect the nonacademic side of our enterprise, unfortunately, UAlbany’s academic program will be further impacted. Among these actions is the suspension of new admission to five degree programs — classics, French, Italian, Russian and theater — pending further consultation with faculty.

    George M. Philip, president State University of New York at Albany

    Passive voice, the innocent bystander figure

    When you don’t want to take the blame, use the passive voice. Not “We cut the departments” but “the departments will unfortunately be further impacted.” On the other hand, when you want to sound like an intelligent, educated person in charge, use the active voice.

    Style makes the man; in this case it undoes the man.

    At any rate, the arguments over cutting humanities seem to miss the main point. These subjects suffer from a serious branding problem. Academics call them “humanities” (a word that implies a secret stalking horse for atheism); or, even worse, “liberal arts,” which might train young minds to drive Priuses or raise local organic radicchio.

    Instead, why not brand these departments with “Leadership”? That’s what the original liberal arts were: they prepared the “liberally” (free) born for membership in the elite.  Put French, Italian, and Russian under “International Leadership,” and merge theater with public speaking. Add a strong dose of rhetoric, and by golly you have genuine preparation for people who want to make an, um, impact.

    Next step: teaching SUNY Albany’s current leader to write a decent sentence. Yeesh.

    PrintView Printer Friendly Version

    EmailEmail Article to Friend

    Reader Comments (24)

    Stalking horses for atheism?! For the first time, I'm interested in getting a humanities degree. I'd skulk a horse for atheism, if only to find out how stalking horses in secret promotes atheism.

    By the way, Stalking Horses for Atheism is the name of my nephew's indie band. Check them out.
    October 21, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterMarco
    OK. I think I read that wrong. "Stalking horse" apparently must be some sort of idiom.
    October 21, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterMarco
    Yep. "Stalking horse" come from hunting; people once used a horse to flush out game. In public discourse, a stalking horse is an inoffensive proposal, program or label that tests people's reaction.
    October 25, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterFigaro
    I can't say I'm surprised about the elusive and convoluted syntax. This is yet another example of AdministrativeSpeak in Higher Ed. http://www.soowatch.com
    November 19, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterReplica watch

    PostPost a New Comment

    Enter your information below to add a new comment.

    My response is on my own website »
    Author Email (optional):
    Author URL (optional):
    Post:
     
    All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.